alex (our liason) emailed a copy of all of our articles to jenny graham and she replied with some feedback on how she feels we could improve. this was my feedback.
"James’ piece on Wikipedia needs a lot more data and theoretical references to support his personal views – and he needs to unpick his section about ‘How ‘true’ is Wikipedia’, in which he makes some fairly general assumptions."
taking what she has said on board, i now know what improvements i need to make and which sections of my article need looking at closer.
-i need to use references and quotes when talking about my personal views. this way people sitting the exam can use these as references too.
-how true is wikipedia doesn't make sense, firstly i'm going to change the title to how accurate is wikipedia. and instead of stating my opinion i shall find an article and quote from that as to how accurate wikipedia is. my opinion isn't enough.
-double check statistics are up to date and use more references to data
-write the article with references to the exam questions as well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment